Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus Pioglitazone in the Treatment of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a complication related to obesity and metabolic syndrome. There are increased incidences of NAFLD/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) due to rising obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality. The two promising therapeutic agents for treating NAFLD/NASH are sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and pioglitazone. The reason is their potential to target underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. SGLT2 inhibitors may help treat NAFLD/NASH by reducing insulin resistance and improving glucose control, thereby lowering hepatic fat accumulation and inflammation, although their exact mechanism in this context is still being studied. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors and pioglitazone in treating NAFLD/NASH. Major research literature databases were searched, and appropriate keywords were used to find relevant articles published in the last three years. Eighteen studies were critically evaluated using standardized quality assessment tools. Among those, nine studies qualified as medium or high quality and were included in the review. Both SGLT2 inhibitors and pioglitazone showed promising results in improving NAFLD/NASH. The efficacy outcomes assessed liver fat content, liver enzyme levels, histological improvement, and metabolic parameters. The safety outcomes considered adverse events and cardiovascular events. The conducted review suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors and pioglitazone are potential treatment options for NAFLD/NASH. Having said that, individualized considerations are essential. It includes patient comorbidities, preferences, and overall safety profiles. Further research is needed to assess long-term effects and outcomes. It would provide more definitive evidence of these treatment options' comparative efficacy and safety for NAFLD/NASH.

Exploring Circulating Tumor DNA (CtDNA) and Its Role in Early Detection of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

There is a significant increase in the need for an efficient screening method that might identify cancer at an early stage and could improve patients' long-term survival due to the continued rise in cancer incidence and associated mortality. One such effort involved using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a rescue agent for a non-invasive blood test that may identify many tumors. A tumor marker called ctDNA is created by cells with the same DNA alterations. Due to its shorter half-life, it may be useful for both early cancer detection and real-time monitoring of tumor development, therapeutic response, and tumor outcomes. We obtained 156 papers from PUBMED using the MeSH approach in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria and ten articles from additional online resources. After removing articles with irrelevant titles and screening the abstract and full text of the articles that contained information unrelated to or not specific to the title query using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 out of 166 articles were chosen for the quality check. Fourteen medium to high-quality papers were chosen out of the 18 publications to be included in the study design. The reviewed literature showed no significant utility of ctDNA in detecting early-stage tumors of size less than 1 cm diameter. Still, the ideal screening test would require the assay to detect a size <5 mm tumor, which is nearly impossible with the current data. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay ranged from 69% to 98% and 99%, respectively. Furthermore, CancerSEEK achieves tumor origin localization in 83% of cases, while targeted error correction sequencing (TEC-Seq) assays demonstrate a cancer detection rate ranging from 59% to 71%, depending on the type of cancer. However, it could be of great value as a prognostic indicator, and the levels are associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, wherein the positive detection of ctDNA is associated with worse OS compared to the tumors detected through standard procedures, with an odds ratio (OS) of 4.83. We conclude that ctDNA could be better applied in cancer patients for prognosis, disease progression monitoring, and treatment outcomes compared to its use in early cancer detection. Due to its specific feature of recognizing the tumor-related mutations, it could be implemented as a supplemental tool to assess the nature of the tumor, grade, and size of the tumor and for predicting the outcomes by pre-operative and post-operative evaluation of the tumor marker, ctDNA, and thereby estimating PFS and OS depending on the level of marker present. A vast amount of research is required in early detection to determine the sensitivity, specificity, false positive rates, and false negative rates in evaluating its true potential as a screening tool. Even if the test could detect the mutations, an extensive workup for the search of tumor is required as the assay could only detect but cannot localize the disease. Establishing the clinical validity and utility of ctDNA is imperative for its implementation in future clinical practice.

The Effects of Risperidone on Cognition in People With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Autism spectrum disorder is made up of several disorders, which include autism, Asperger syndrome, and pervasive developmental disorder. Boys are four times more likely to be diagnosed than girls with autism spectrum disorder, and symptoms usually become apparent by the age of three. Autism spectrum disorders' core characteristic features are abnormal interaction, impairment in communication, and stereotyped behaviors with restricted activities and interests. There are also non-core features associated with autism spectrum disorder, and these are aggression, self-injurious behavior, and tantrums. To date, there is no one drug approved to treat the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder, but antipsychotic drugs such as risperidone have been shown to be effective at treating both core and non-core symptoms in controlled trials using multiple behavioral rating scales such as the Aberrant Behavioral Checklist subscale, the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale, the Ritvo-Freeman Real Life Scale, the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, and the Social Withdrawal Subscale. The safety, efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of risperidone were assessed in these studies, and weight gain was a common side effect observed, but the outcome was usually mild and self-limiting. The effect of risperidone on cognition was explored in this article. The studies selected for this article were of small sample size and short duration, which presented limitations for treatment with risperidone and an area that needs to be explored further for its contribution to clinical practice.